abhaykul
06-19 02:35 PM
I applaud IV's core member's achievement so far. I have been participating from Sunjoshi's S1932 thread to ISNAmerica.org and finally was happy when I saw IV progressing.As busy professionals what IV's core member's have achieved is commendable.
Looking back @ S1932 and this comprehensive Immigration reform bill. I strongly feel that we should concentrate on backing a bill meant only for legal Immigration. Anti Illegal immigration forces, make no mistake are all anti legal Immigration too. So these folks make lot of noice and have found means like budget reconciliation and amnesty to block our reforms. Majority of Americans and the lawmakers are pro-Legal Immigration (We have seen this when Senator Byrd amendment was voted out when the senate was discussing S1932).It does not mean we should not take any part in Comprehensive Immigration reform or similar bills. In fact we should all still send faxes call lawmakers and be vocal as much as we can but the main
aim has to be a bill dealing with legal Immigration only. One Other point I would like to put forth is we should Initiate a "for Legal Immigration only" bill in the house first so will not be jubilant when it passes in senate and then go in depression when it fails in committee or the house. If Dem's come to power in the house the scenario is going to be very different after the November elections but for now this is all we can do for the few days remaining before the election.
Looking back @ S1932 and this comprehensive Immigration reform bill. I strongly feel that we should concentrate on backing a bill meant only for legal Immigration. Anti Illegal immigration forces, make no mistake are all anti legal Immigration too. So these folks make lot of noice and have found means like budget reconciliation and amnesty to block our reforms. Majority of Americans and the lawmakers are pro-Legal Immigration (We have seen this when Senator Byrd amendment was voted out when the senate was discussing S1932).It does not mean we should not take any part in Comprehensive Immigration reform or similar bills. In fact we should all still send faxes call lawmakers and be vocal as much as we can but the main
aim has to be a bill dealing with legal Immigration only. One Other point I would like to put forth is we should Initiate a "for Legal Immigration only" bill in the house first so will not be jubilant when it passes in senate and then go in depression when it fails in committee or the house. If Dem's come to power in the house the scenario is going to be very different after the November elections but for now this is all we can do for the few days remaining before the election.
wallpaper Holding hands
dingox100
03-09 09:21 AM
I recently did apply for EAD and the documents required are as below
1. Personal check or Money order for 380$. I prefer sending personal check so that i can know if my check was cashed.
2. I did paper filing and not e-Filing. Some say efile is better some say paper filing is better , i felt paper filing is easy and better , as we can track our documents sent.
3. Docs req are
1. Filled EAD Application form
2. your 485 receipt notice copy
3. Current Addresss proof. electricity bill, water bill etc.
3.Copy of the biographic page of passport for each applicant
4. i-94 Copy
5. 2 Photographs
6. SSN copy ( i put it as my attorney suggested but its not mandatory)
7. copy of driver licence
1. Personal check or Money order for 380$. I prefer sending personal check so that i can know if my check was cashed.
2. I did paper filing and not e-Filing. Some say efile is better some say paper filing is better , i felt paper filing is easy and better , as we can track our documents sent.
3. Docs req are
1. Filled EAD Application form
2. your 485 receipt notice copy
3. Current Addresss proof. electricity bill, water bill etc.
3.Copy of the biographic page of passport for each applicant
4. i-94 Copy
5. 2 Photographs
6. SSN copy ( i put it as my attorney suggested but its not mandatory)
7. copy of driver licence
battineni
06-09 10:46 AM
Really good work by IV team
2011 Pictures Of People Holding Hands Around The World. 3D
chanduv23
10-26 06:52 AM
Looks like this post has not been showing on the "new posts"
more...
bharat2008
08-09 12:13 AM
Hi all
I have I-140 approved from Company A . Company B applied for my H1B extn based on Company A's approved I-140 and got 3 years extension till 2011.
My question:
can I switch to company C now and get 3 more years extension again.? My I-140(company A) has not been revoked and priority date is not current.I want to start my PERM only after joining company C .
Thanks in advance .
I have I-140 approved from Company A . Company B applied for my H1B extn based on Company A's approved I-140 and got 3 years extension till 2011.
My question:
can I switch to company C now and get 3 more years extension again.? My I-140(company A) has not been revoked and priority date is not current.I want to start my PERM only after joining company C .
Thanks in advance .
dvb123
06-01 10:43 PM
We are in an era of US Immigration where a Fashion model work permit bill would have a better chance of clearing the house than a highly skilled immigrants bill.
05/09/2008: Fashion Model P-4 Visa Classification Bill, H.R.4080 Approved by House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee 05/08/2008
As we reported yesterday, the subcommittee debated this bill and approved this bill for the full Judiciary Committee action of the House yesterday. A small positive news on the immigration legislation!
http://www.immigration-law.com/
The OPT 17 month extension rule ran into problems barely a month after it was introduced. The anti-immigrant groups constantly send faxes, emails and snail mail constantly to stop immigrant bills from passing. This frightens the senators and house representatives because they think that majority of United States citizens are agains't immigrant bills while an average United States citizen does not the know the difference between green card and H1 B clearly, leave alone opposing highly skilled immigrant bills.
USCIS makes tons of mistakes but it will try to repeal mistakes if it believes that it has made an error. The CSPA new regulations is an example of USCIS accepting and rectifying its mistakes.
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_revcsp.html
The AC21 act gave an additional visa number pool of approx 130,000 visa numbers which were actually unused EB visa numbers from 1999 and 2000. This is a reserve visa pool that could be used for future fiscal years. HOW CAN A RESERVE POOL BE USED WHEN THERE WERE UNUSED VISA NUMBERS FROM 2000 TO 2005?
http://www.nafsa.org/regulatory_information.sec/regulatory_document_library.dlib/u.s._immigration_system_2/ac21_-_the_american_competitiveness
The solution to our saga is to count the immigrant visa numbers from DHS statistics files of EB visas distribution for each year from 2000 to 2005.If we are unable to get all the information required from DHS statistics files we can put FOIA requests and get the information. Instead of making USCIS doing an audit we can do the audit ourselves and inform USCIS that there are still immigrant visa numbers left from the AC21 act. The good thing about this reserve visa numbers is that they can be rolled over to the the future years. So we can get them issued for the years 2008 and 2009.
I think this is the only solution to our saga.
05/09/2008: Fashion Model P-4 Visa Classification Bill, H.R.4080 Approved by House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee 05/08/2008
As we reported yesterday, the subcommittee debated this bill and approved this bill for the full Judiciary Committee action of the House yesterday. A small positive news on the immigration legislation!
http://www.immigration-law.com/
The OPT 17 month extension rule ran into problems barely a month after it was introduced. The anti-immigrant groups constantly send faxes, emails and snail mail constantly to stop immigrant bills from passing. This frightens the senators and house representatives because they think that majority of United States citizens are agains't immigrant bills while an average United States citizen does not the know the difference between green card and H1 B clearly, leave alone opposing highly skilled immigrant bills.
USCIS makes tons of mistakes but it will try to repeal mistakes if it believes that it has made an error. The CSPA new regulations is an example of USCIS accepting and rectifying its mistakes.
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_revcsp.html
The AC21 act gave an additional visa number pool of approx 130,000 visa numbers which were actually unused EB visa numbers from 1999 and 2000. This is a reserve visa pool that could be used for future fiscal years. HOW CAN A RESERVE POOL BE USED WHEN THERE WERE UNUSED VISA NUMBERS FROM 2000 TO 2005?
http://www.nafsa.org/regulatory_information.sec/regulatory_document_library.dlib/u.s._immigration_system_2/ac21_-_the_american_competitiveness
The solution to our saga is to count the immigrant visa numbers from DHS statistics files of EB visas distribution for each year from 2000 to 2005.If we are unable to get all the information required from DHS statistics files we can put FOIA requests and get the information. Instead of making USCIS doing an audit we can do the audit ourselves and inform USCIS that there are still immigrant visa numbers left from the AC21 act. The good thing about this reserve visa numbers is that they can be rolled over to the the future years. So we can get them issued for the years 2008 and 2009.
I think this is the only solution to our saga.
more...
pappu
04-07 04:59 AM
Check news article thread first post and modify the text. We would prefer everyone writes a simple post in their own words. It does not need to be long. For more details they can look at IV site.
2010 2010 Holding+earth+hands people holding hands around earth. people holding
hebbar77
03-15 08:51 PM
It could be discussed many times here. but I dont know the answer! Please help!
more...
BumbleBee
07-27 05:52 PM
Its complicated and gray area, I haven't seen any success from anybody yet.:confused:
There are two ways of porting older priority date
#1 if your old PD is stuck in backlog center, file a new perm labor with exact same wordings( same category too ), this is well documented.
#2 If you have an approved labor(can be substituted also) and approved I-140, then file a new labor with any employer under any category(eb2 in your case). Once labor is approved, at the time of filling new I-140, you need to specify that you want to port priority date of previously approved I-140. Specify relavent memos too, try finding attorney who knows or have done this atleast once :D
"EB3 - Labor filed - Aug, 2004 - BackLogged - Philadelphia - 45 day letter - Replied"
priority date from above labor can only be captured if it gets approved and employer files and get I-140 approval for this labor, and then you go ahead and file a new I-140 for your already approved EB2 specifying need to recapture old PD.
This is all from top of my head w/o having any degree in relavent field, please talk to attorney before taking any action blah blah blah.......
BumbleBee
There are two ways of porting older priority date
#1 if your old PD is stuck in backlog center, file a new perm labor with exact same wordings( same category too ), this is well documented.
#2 If you have an approved labor(can be substituted also) and approved I-140, then file a new labor with any employer under any category(eb2 in your case). Once labor is approved, at the time of filling new I-140, you need to specify that you want to port priority date of previously approved I-140. Specify relavent memos too, try finding attorney who knows or have done this atleast once :D
"EB3 - Labor filed - Aug, 2004 - BackLogged - Philadelphia - 45 day letter - Replied"
priority date from above labor can only be captured if it gets approved and employer files and get I-140 approval for this labor, and then you go ahead and file a new I-140 for your already approved EB2 specifying need to recapture old PD.
This is all from top of my head w/o having any degree in relavent field, please talk to attorney before taking any action blah blah blah.......
BumbleBee
hair People Holding Hands Around The World. of people holding
sukhyani
10-04 10:16 AM
Anybody? Any thoughts? Does it mean they are processing his case?
more...
ya
06-09 10:30 PM
patryder.com he used what you are talking about
hot People Holding Hands Around
ksircar
06-24 09:58 PM
If I-140 is approved and priority date is current is it possible to keep on extending H1B for couple of years without applying for I-485? I am asking this quetion because my employer is not allowing me to apply for I-485 as my I-140 is pending. It looks like he want to use me for couple of years on H1b.
Better do not trust your employer, it may turn out to be an infinite loop. Try to convince your employer by all means to file for I485. You never know what your employer really means by "couple of years".
Better do not trust your employer, it may turn out to be an infinite loop. Try to convince your employer by all means to file for I485. You never know what your employer really means by "couple of years".
more...
house Holding Hands Around
Counterproductive
10-28 09:09 PM
No need to say sorry to me, I was just pointing it out.
Don't really know how popular it was, it might not be an issue.
But just to be safe you might want to change it.
Don't really know how popular it was, it might not be an issue.
But just to be safe you might want to change it.
tattoo people holding hands around earth. of holding hands around a
americandesi
09-04 02:16 PM
To all fellow GC applicants and immigration gurus.I have this question to ask.I recently got my I-140 and applied I-485 (Aug 1 2007).
My employer is moving office to new address.How will it effect my future GC process ?. Thanks in advance
If the company is moving within the same county then no issues.
If it's moving to a different state (or) to a different county within the same state, then refer the following thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=158508&postcount=7
Remember, the prevailing wage differs from county to county even within the same state.
My employer is moving office to new address.How will it effect my future GC process ?. Thanks in advance
If the company is moving within the same county then no issues.
If it's moving to a different state (or) to a different county within the same state, then refer the following thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=158508&postcount=7
Remember, the prevailing wage differs from county to county even within the same state.
more...
pictures people holding hands around earth. Many+people+holding+hands
gc_eb2_waiter
02-02 04:34 PM
I have received my green card 5 months ago and still working for the same GC filing employer(a consulting company). My wife had an RFE on her GC, since she could not take MMR at 2007 fiasco time. We have recently replied with the evidence. Now my project is getting over at the client site in next couple of weeks. I am sure that I can lose my job at consulting company also.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
dresses Holding Hands Around
gbof
08-26 10:56 PM
My limited understanding about the GC process is that from the day I-485 is filed, a person may change his/her job only after 180 days or more, and of course by filing AC 21. Also, in case the I-485 does not get approved within the 180 days after filing, then how can a person change a job without having an EAD.
A person can EAD only once I-485 is approved? Is that correct. Please throw some light on the above points. Thanks in advance.
There is nothing like filing AC21, you may or may not inform uscis about changing job/new employer
Once your I-485 is approved you DONOT need EAD. Infact with approval of I-485-- EAD becomes defunt/invalid. You will need EAD based upon pending I-485 to switch jobs...
A person can EAD only once I-485 is approved? Is that correct. Please throw some light on the above points. Thanks in advance.
There is nothing like filing AC21, you may or may not inform uscis about changing job/new employer
Once your I-485 is approved you DONOT need EAD. Infact with approval of I-485-- EAD becomes defunt/invalid. You will need EAD based upon pending I-485 to switch jobs...
more...
makeup makeup Children holding hands,
IneedAllGreen
06-22 09:48 PM
Thanks man. Appreciated.
INeedAllGreen
<today�s date>
US Department of Homeland Security
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
<your USCIS Service Center address>
<signature, name and designation of authorized person>
<company name>
INeedAllGreen
<today�s date>
US Department of Homeland Security
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
<your USCIS Service Center address>
<signature, name and designation of authorized person>
<company name>
girlfriend hot on people holding hands people holding hands around earth. stick people
WaitingUnlimited
01-18 12:43 PM
First of all, Welcome to Immigration Voice!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
hairstyles circle holding hands every
FinalGC
06-09 10:42 AM
Good Job...Pappu and IV Team..
Puncher
February 1st, 2006, 04:46 PM
You'll always have very limited DOF in macro situations. That's why real macro lenses (ex. the Micro-Nikkors) are optimised to give good results even when stopped down a lot.
GLIX
09-26 12:15 PM
This is who I have been using. She has a license to practice in New York.
Shirley Tang
Parsekian & Solomon, P.C.
140 Main Street
Hackensack, NJ 07601
Tel. 201.487.2080
Fax. 201.487.7645
Shirley Tang
Parsekian & Solomon, P.C.
140 Main Street
Hackensack, NJ 07601
Tel. 201.487.2080
Fax. 201.487.7645
No comments:
Post a Comment